Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common metabolic disorders in the
industrialized countries. The disease has been diagnosed in approx. five
million people in Germany alone. This figure corresponds to about 6%
of the total population (Bruns & Findler, 2001). It is estimated
that 25% of all critically ill patients dependent on enteral or parenteral
nutrition have a diabetic metabolism (Wright, 2000).
The disease diabetes mellitus is characterized by a total deficiency
of insulin (type 1) or a progressive insulin resistance (type 2). Since
insulin is one of the central hormones in human metabolism, numerous
metabolic processes are impaired in patients suffering from diabetes.
Insulin deficiency or insulin resistance have an especially marked effect
on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. The direct results are periods
of hyperglycemia (i.e. elevated blood sugar) and altered blood lipid
values which are the cause, over the long term, of the increased morbidity
and mortality exhibited by these patients. Typical diabetic complications
include kidney damage (nephropathy), blindness (retinopathy) and a heightened
risk of developing cardiovascular disease.
Precise monitoring of the metabolic status of diabetic patients is vital
in order to improve their life quality and life expectancy. Blood sugar
values should be kept within narrow limits; blood lipid and blood pressure
values have to be brought into line with normal values. In addition,
a reduction of overweight is advisable, especially in patients with type
2 diabetes mellitus. Since the discovery of insulin in 1921, the pharmacological
treatment of diabetes has met with increasing success. Besides insulin,
there are numerous oral medications available today which permit better
metabolic management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Next to pharmacological treatment, a balanced diet adapted to the specific
metabolic requirements of the diabetic patient plays an outstanding role
in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Within the context of clinical
nutrition, in particular, the successful combination of selective diabetic
nutrition and pharmacological therapy has made a major contribution toward
improving metabolic control and clinical outcome.
The intestinal microflora represents a complex ecosystem affected by
various environmental factors. It can be altered, for example, by several
constituents of the human diet as well as by bacteria contained in our
food. The following definitions will provide a survey of the nutrient
groups involved.
units
Plasma glucose
(fasting)
Oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT)
Normal
mg/dl
mmol/l
< 110
< 6.1
< 140
< 7.8
Abnormal glucose tolerance
mg/dl
mmol/l
140-199
6.1-7.0
Diabetes mellitus
mg/dl
mmol/l
> 126
> 7.0
> 200
> 11.1
Table 1: Diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus
(modified from Kerner, 1998)
The measurement of HbA1c, a subgroup of hemoglobin altered by glycosylation,
is very important for the long-term evaluation of the glucose concentration.
HbA1c is created by a chemical reaction between glucose and the primary
amino group of hemoglobin. This glycosylated form of hemoglobin remains
stable over the entire lifetime of the erythrocytes; for this reason,
it provides valuable information on the mean blood sugar value during
the last 6-8 weeks. Whereas HbA1c values equal to < 6.0% of total
hemoglobin are considered normal values > 7.5% point to a permanently
elevated plasma glucose concentration. A change in the HbA1c value of
1% corresponds roughly to a change in the mean plasma glucose concentration
of 36 mg/dl or 2.0 mmol/l (Landgraf & Haslbeck, 1999; Schumacher,
1999).
Diabetes mellitus is a heterogeneous disease; the term is used to describe
all forms of acute and chronic hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar) accompanied
by additional disorders of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism (Badenhoop & Usadel,
1999). The complex diabetic syndrome is broken down into several types.
The most recent concept for the classification and diagnosis of diabetes
mellitus was presented by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) in
1997. It is based primarily on etiological and pathogenetic criteria
and recognizes four different classes of diabetes mellitus (Table 3).
I
Diabetes mellitus type 1
A. of immunological origin
B. idiopathic
II
Diabetes mellitus type 2
(insulin resistance with relative insulin deficiency, secretion deficit
accompanied by insulin resistance)
III
Other specific types
A. Genetic defects affecting ß-cell function
B. Genetic defects affecting the action of insulin
C. Diseases of the exocrine pancreas (e.g. pancreatitis)
D. Endocrine diseases (e.g. Cushing´s syndrome)
E. Toxic drug-induced diabetes (e.g. by glucocorticoids)
F. Infections (e.g. congenital rubella)
G. Rare forms of immunological origin (e.g. "stiff man syndromeö)
H. Other syndromes sometimes associated with diabetes (e.g. Down´s
syndrome)
IV
Gestational diabetes mellitus
Table 3: Classification of diabetes mellitus,
ADA 1997
(modified from Kerner, 1998)
Diabetes mellitus type I usually has an onset during childhood or adolescence;
however, it can also appear for the first time in later life. Patients
with type 1a have a genetic predisposition causing increased antibody
formation against the endogenous ß-cells of the pancreas. This
leads first to a reduction of insulin production and finally to total
insulin deficiency. The causes of the autoimmune reaction have not yet
been fully elucidated; it is suspected that viral infections, various
toxic substances and nutritional factors play a role (Kasper, 2000).
In the Federal Republic of Germany diabetes mellitus type 1a accounts
for approx. 5% of all cases of diabetes. So far no plausible explanation
exists for the pathogenesis of subtype 1b, or idiopathic diabetes mellitus;
this form of the disease is practically unknown in Europe (Kerner, 1998).
With the onset of total insulin deficiency, type 1 diabetics require
an external supply of insulin (Cf. 3.2). For this reasons, this form
of the disease was long referred to as "insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitusö (IDDM). In this form of the disease, the intake of food
and the administration of insulin must be coordinated carefully to prevent
excessive fluctuations in their blood sugar concentration and the concomitant
complications (Cf. 2.3 and 2.4).
Diabetes mellitus type 2 usually has an onset in adulthood. It is characterized
by pronounced insulin resistance – usually in combination with
inadequate insulin secretion. The main causes of diabetes mellitus type
2 are sustained hyperalimentation, possibly in connection with hepatic
and muscular insulin resistance of genetic origin. To stimulate the insulin-resistant
tissue sufficiently, the body initially produces more insulin – a
condition referred to as compensatory hyperinsulinemia. The organism
reacts to this oversupply by reducing the number of insulin receptors – a
mechanism known as "down regulationö. A hypercaloric diet
worsens this vicious cycle, since the above-average increase in blood
sugar augments insulin production; this again leads to intensified down
regulation (Kasper, 2000).
Owing to the permanent over-stimulation of the ß-cells in the
pancreas, the patient experiences phases of insulin deficiency; these
are initially noticeable during the phases of maximum insulin secretion,
i.e.
• during the postprandial rise in blood sugar
• in particular stress situations
• during the morning hours when an increased amount of insulin antagonists
is secreted into the blood as a result of the circadian rhythm.
This leads to phases of hyperglycemia or glucose intolerance (Bruns & Findler,
2001).
During the hyperinsulinemic phases, the diabetes can still be managed
by dietary measures and physical exercise since a reduced supply of energy
leads to "up regulationö (i.e. an increase) of the insulin
receptors. Only after the ß-cells of the pancreas start to secrete
less insulin is the administration of insulinotropic substances, or insulin,
indicated (Kasper, 2000).
Type 2 diabetes mellitus accounts for approx. 92% of all cases of diabetes.
The incidence is cumulative and affects over 20% of the total population
after age 60. Diabetes mellitus type 2 occurs frequently in combination
with obesity, hyperlipoproteinemia and hypertension. The simultaneous
occurrence of these conditions is referred to as the "metabolic
syndromeö and characterizes a group of people at risk of developing
premature arteriosclerosis (Bruns & Findler, 2001).
In the ADA classification system, class III comprises all other types
of diabetes; these are broken down in the subgroups A to H. Group A includes
the so-called MODY types (MODY = maturity onset diabetes in young people),
which have previously been classified as diabetes mellitus type 2 because
they are non-insulin-dependent. This form of the disease generally appears
before the age of 25 and is characterized by genetic defects of ß-cell
function. Groups B to H represent types of diabetes caused by a number
of primary diseases or are induced by drugs and/or toxic substances (Table
3). The diabetic syndromes classified as Group III account for 3% of
all cases of diabetes (Badenhoop & Usadel, 1999; Bruns & Findler,
2001).
The defining feature of gestational diabetes (Class IV) is hyperglycemia
diagnosed for the first time during pregnancy. Class IV is a heterogeneous
group; it includes both women who have developed a short-term disturbance
of glucose tolerance caused by the metabolic changes occurring during
pregnancy and women with diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 which has manifested
itself for the first time during pregnancy. The incidence of class IV
diabetes is 2-4% of all pregnant women (Sauer & Rath, 2001).
Diabetes mellitus is caused by deficient insulin production by the ß-cells
of the pancreas and/or insulin resistance of the insulin-sensitive tissue.
Because insulin is a hormone which plays a central role in human metabolism,
diabetes is inevitably accompanied with numerous other metabolic disturbances;
these can cause both short-term and long-term damage to the organism
(Cf. 2.3 and 2.4).
Insulin performs vital functions in carbohydrate, lipid and protein
metabolism; in addition, it stimulates the transport of sugars and amino
acids across membranes (Table 4):
Type of metabolism
Metabolic process
Organ
Carbohydrate
Stimulation of glycogen synthesis
Fat tissue, muscle, liver
Inhibition of gluconeogenesis
Liver
Stimulation of the transport of sugar across membranes
Fat tissue, muscle
Lipids
Stimulation of triglyceride and fatty acid synthesis
Fat tissue, liver
Inhibition of lipolysis
Fat tissue
Protein
Stimulation of protein synthesis
Fat tissue, muscle
Inhibition of proteolysis
Muscle, liver
Stimulation of the transport of amino acids across membranes
Fat tissue, muscle
Table 4: Effect of insulin on metabolic processes
(modified from Hepp & Häring, 1999)
In the healthy organism the rise in the blood glucose concentration
following food intake causes increased insulin secretion by the ß-cells
of the pancreas. This reaction takes place in two phases; whereas the
first phase is triggered by the rapid change in the glucose concentration,
the second depends on the level of glucose concentration. This biphasic
insulin secretion ensures precise regulation allowing the organism to
maintain the postprandial blood glucose concentration within the narrow
range of 60-160 mg/dl (Fig. 1). Insulin causes the uptake of blood glucose
by fat tissue and muscle. In the liver (which can take up glucose independently
of insulin), as well as in other tissue, insulin stimulates the process
of glycogenesis, i.e. the formation of glycogen, a glucose-storage substance.
Fig. 1: Dynamics of the postprandial metabolic reaction
to the ingestion of food – the most important physiological parameters
plotted as curves (Berger, 1995)
The average carbohydrate uptake of an adult is approx. 240 g per day;
of this total, about 170 g is broken down into glucose – and absorbed – in
the intestines. Apart from dietary glucose, a person weighing 70 kg produces
approx. 240 g of endogenous glucose in the liver (gluconeogenesis). This
endogenous glucose ensures that, even during periods of fasting, there
will be an adequate supply of glucose to tissues which exclusively require
glucose as energy substrate (i.e. erythrocytes, renal medulla, parts
of the brain). Insulin regulates the process of gluconeogenesis in order
to prevent overproduction of glucose and the resulting elevated fasting
blood sugar values. A fasting blood glucose value of 100 mg/dl is associated
with a balanced production of glucose (Chanteleau, 1995).
Besides insulin, there are other hormones (e.g. glucagon, catecholamine,
growth hormone, somatostatin, etc.) which have effects on carbohydrate
metabolism. The exact mechanism of action of these hormones will not
be dealt with in detail here.
The type of food intake has a substantial effect on the rise in blood
glucose and can reduce the amount of insulin required for blood glucose
regulation. Already at the end of the last century it was abserved ,
that different types of foods with the same carbohydrate content cause
blood glucose to rise to different levels after meals. A Glycemic Index
was set down on the basis of these this finding showing the rise in blood
glucose measured after a carbohydrate-containing meal expressed as a
percent of the increase in blood glucose after the ingestion of the same
amount of pure glucose (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2: Glycemic Index of oranges (Berger, 1995)
(CH = carbohydrate)
The glycemic index of a food is specific for a particular substrate
and person. Numerous factors contribute to the value of the index: the
percentage of dietary fiber which is effective in reducing blood sugar
(Cf. 4.2), the manner in which the carbohydrate food was prepared, the
water content of the food (liquid dietary components are absorbed faster),
temperature, physical consistency, size of the meal, and individual variation.
It is evident, from this broad spectrum of contributing factors, that
precise determination of the glycemic index is virtually impossible.
Nevertheless, it makes sense for the diabetic – and in particular
the type 2 diabetic – to choose foods with a low glycemic index
(Table 5) since these result in lower postprandial in blood sugar levels
while leading to other beneficial effects, such as weight-reduction,
by virtue of the large amount of dietary fiber they usually contain (Laube & Mehnert,
1999; Cf. 4.2).
Food
glycemic index
Glucose
100
Cola beverage
97
Baguette
95
Oatmeal
64
Whole grain bread (fine)
63
Potatoes
49
Whole grain bread (coarse)
38
Apple
33
Lentils
30
Table 5: Glycemic Index of various foods (Chantelau,
1995)
The blood glucose concentration is also affected by physical exercise.
Owing to the consumption of glucose by the muscles, muscular activity
forces a non-insulin-dependent outflow of blood glucose into the muscle
cells. As a consequence, carbohydrates ingested during muscular activity
are utilized without the necessity of a burst of insulin production by
the ß-cells (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3: Dynamics of postprandial glycemia and insulinemia
in healthy persons at rest and during muscular activity (Berger, 1995)
The insulin deficiency or insulin resistance exhibited by diabetic
patients results in abnormal blood sugar levels, either in the form of
hyperglycemic phases (in untreated individuals) or hypoglycemic phases
(in individuals with poor diabetes management resulting, for example,
in the admission of overly high doses of exogenous insulin. These hyperglycemic
and hypoglycemic phases can lead to diabetic coma and a bevy of long
term complications (Cf. 2.4).
In patients with the clinical picture of diabetes, the regulation of
blood sugar is generally the main goal of the treatment. However, the
changes of lipid metabolism due to insulin deficiency deserve at least
equal attention. As shown in Table 4, insulin is responsible, under normal
metabolic conditions, for inhibition of lipolysis as well as for stimulation
of triglyceride and fatty acid synthesis.
In the presence of an adequate glucose supply, a balance is struck in
fat tissue between lipolysis and the re-esterification of free fatty
acids. When the inflow of glucose into the tissue is reduced, as in individuals
who have diabetic metabolism or are fasting, the triglycerides (stored
fat) are increasingly broken down into free fatty acids and glycerol.
These free fatty acids are discharged into the blood and transported
to the muscles and liver. Since the liver cannot utilize all of the free
fatty acids for energy production, some of the free fatty acids are converted
to ketone bodies or, via re-esterification, to triglycerides.. The ketone
bodies serve as energy carriers which can be freely transported in the
blood and can serve as an energy substrate in the muscles.
In persons with absolute insulin deficiency (diabetes mellitus type
1), too many ketone bodies may enter the blood, leading to metabolic
acidosis (Cf. 2.3). The triglycerides synthesized in the liver are discharged
into the bloodstream again so that they do not accumulate in the liver.
In the blood they are transported by lipoproteins. The release of an
increased amount of lipoproteins into the blood frequently results in
hyperlipoproteinemia, especially in diabetics who are already obese.
These elevated blood lipid values heighten the risk of aortosclerosis
immensely (Hepp & Haring, 1999, Koolmann & Röhm, 1998).
The typical clinical picture of hyperlipoproteinemia comprises elevated
VLDL (very low density lipoprotein) values, elevated total cholesterol
and LDL (low density lipoprotein-cholesterol) values and reduced HDL
(high density lipoprotein) - cholesterol concentrations (McCargar et
al, 1998).
Protein metabolism is also impaired in patients with diabetes mellitus.
The deficiency of insulin or the lack of effect of the insulin present
results in a decreased intake of amino acids by the muscles simultaneous
with a reduction of protein synthesis and enhanced proteolysis. The result
is catabolism of the muscles with huge depletion of protein stores despite
the large supply of other fuels. The degraded amino acids are primarily
transported to the liver in the form of alanine; here they are used either
for gluconeogenesis (further increase in blood sugar) or the production
of urea (Hepp & Haring, 1999).
As described in 2.2, insulin deficiency leads to an increase in blood
sugar via several routes and, in addition, to intensified degradation
of lipids and proteins. If the blood sugar level remains above 160 mg/dl – 180
mg/dl for longer periods, the excess glucose will be excreted via the
kidneys. This sugar can be demonstrated in the urine once the borderline
kidney threshold value, i.e. the ability of the kidney to re-absorb glucose,
is exceeded. Owing to the high osmotic pressure exerted by the sugar,
urine production also rises (polyuria) to up to 10-15 L/day. This enormous
loss of liquids and electrolytes can hardly be offset by drinking even
enormous amounts of liquid. The consequences are weakness, tiredness,
lack of drive. The increasing imbalance between fluid loss and fluid
intake leads to exsiccosis and culminates in a hyperosmolar diabetic
coma.
The intensified lipid degradation and the resulting overproduction of
ketone bodies can cause complications. Acetone and the organic acid cations
acetoacetate and hydroxybutate, result in over-acidification of the blood
(acidosis) which causes deeper respiration (Kussmaul respiration and
acetone breath) and vomiting. These developments accelerate the loss
of fluids and electrolytes. Furthermore, the concomitant ketoacidosis
precipitates and earlier onset of hyperosmolar coma (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4 Consequences of insulin deficiency (Over, 1992)
In addition to hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia is an additional risk in
patients with diabetes mellitus. Plasma glucose values below 50 mg/dl
lead to hypoglycemic shock. The symptoms of hypoglycemic shock are unconsciousness,
breaking out in sweats and tremor. Frequent hypoglycemia results in cognitive
dysfunction and an impaired sense of equilibrium; in older patients,
in particular, this can have fatal consequences. Many different factors
can trigger a drop in blood sugar: the most common are the improper use
of hypoglycemic medication, vomiting after the injection of insulin,
diabetic gastroparesis (Cf. 2.4.3), and stress situations (Schrezenmeir,
1998; Kasper, 2000).
Over the long term poor blood sugar management – especially if
accompanied by frequent hyperglycemic phases – can cause a host
of long term complications. These affect both small vessels (microangiopathies)
and major arteries (macroangiopathies). Angiopathies are responsible
for more than 75% of deaths among diabetic and are thus the most common
cause of death in this group (Janka & Standl, 1999: Gonzáles
Barranco 1998).
The "advanced glycosylation end productsö (AGE) also make
a major contribution to the development of numerous long term complications
of diabetes. These products consist of glycosylated cellular constituents.
They are created by the reaction of reducing sugars with free amino acid
groups of proteins. The accumulation of altered cellular constituents
due to poorly controlled blood glucose can cause irreversible damage
to various cellular structures (Kasper, 2000).
It is now assumed that oxidative stress also plays an important role
in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. The term "oxidative
stressö describes a lack of balance between the production of free
radicals and presence of antioxidant defense mechanisms. Antioxidant
systems include substances such as flavonoids, vitamin E and C, carotinoids
and endogenous enzymes such as catalase, superoxide dismutase and glutathione
peroxidase, which convert free radicals into compounds which are less
toxic to the cells. In patients with diabetes, both the overproduction
of free radicals (via hyperglycemia) and a smaller reserve of antioxidant
substances or enzymes have been demonstrated (Rösen et al, 2001;
Cf. 4.5).
Macroangiopathies occur in diabetics at an earlier age than in non-diabetics
and exhibit a rapid course. In particular, the cerebral and coronary
vessels and the vessels of the extremities are affected. The pathogenesis
of the artherosclerotic changes takes a similar course in diabetics and
in other patients; however, it is greatly accelerated by factors such
as increased oxidative stress and a heightened metabolic imbalance (Janka & Standl,
1999). Type 2 diabetics – a group with a high incidence of the
trio of high blood pressure, hyperlipoproteinemia and obesity known as
the "metabolic syndromeö – are especially prone to
heart attacks and stroke; in fact, these events occur two to six times
more frequently in this group than in the rest of the population (Gonzáles
Barranco, 1998). Amputations of the lower extremities have to be performed
more frequently in patients with diabetes mellitus than in the population
as a whole. These conditions affect men more frequently (i.e. 1.18 times
as often) than women. Although doctors have succeeded in lowering this
incidence in recent years, this success story is confined to the group
of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Patients
with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), in contrast, have
not benefited from this development (Ebskov & Ebskov 1996). According
to general estimates, improved control of blood sugar values could reduce
the number of amputations in diabetic patients by 50% and significantly
reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events (Risse, 1999).
Microangiopathies are changes in the epithelia of smaller vessels such
as arterioles and capillaries. The duration of manifest diabetes and
the quality of blood sugar management are the most important factors
in the pathogenesis of this condition. Microvascular changes occur in
both types of diabetes and frequently culminate in renal insufficiency
(nephropathy) and blindness (retinopathy) (Gonzáles Barranco,
1998). Approximately 30% of all new cases of blindness are due to diabetes
(Janka & Standl, 1999).
After a diabetic history of 10 to 15 years, approx. 20-40% of diabetics
patients will develop renal damage (nephropathy). The percentage of type
2 diabetics with renal failure is somewhat lower (10-20%): the late onset
of the disease is given the credit for this lower incidence. Consistent
control of blood sugar and blood pressure values, and a moderately reduced
intake of protein in patients who already exhibit renal insufficiency,
are two measures proven effective in preventing nephropathy (Floege,
2001).
Autonomous polyneuropathy is another long term complications of diabetes.
Unlike other complications experienced by diabetics, polyneuropathy is
in itself not life-threatening. Nevertheless, it can be very unpleasant
for the diabetic. The symptoms range from cardiovascular disorders over
diarrhea, gastroparesis, abnormal sweat regulation straight through to
urogenital dysfunction and impotence (Schumacher, 2000).
In patients with gastroparesis, stomach motility is impaired. This leads
to delays in postprandial gastric emptying. This complication can lead
to unaccustomed metabolic fluctuations accompanied by hypoglycemic phases
following the intake of food. The most frequent symptoms are persistent
sensation of bloating, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting (Schumacher,
2000).
In the diabetic patient, the motility of the small intestine and colon
may also be compromised by autonomous polyneuropathy. The lessened motility
of the small intestine can result in excessive bacterial growth and diarrhea.
Similarly, constipation occurs far more frequently in diabetics (22%)
than in control individuals (7%) as a result of their impaired colon
motility (Vogt et al, 1999). Dietetic treatment concepts can mitigate
the gastrointestinal symptoms listed above (Schumacher, 2000; Cf. 4.2).
Diabetes mellitus is one of the frequent metabolic diseases in the western
world. The numerous complications and long term complications of diabetes
are the cause of the higher morbidity and mortality seen in this group
of patients. In the 1990s two large long-term epidemiological studies
were performed in the USA (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial)
and Great Britain (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study), respectively.
The results of both studies showed that good blood sugar management is
the best prerequisite for a reduction of diabetic complications in both
type 1 and type 2 diabetics. There are various approaches, some of which
can be combined, to attaining the desired state of euglycemia. In type
2 diabetics, in particular, dietary modification undertaken at an early
stage can have a positive impact on its later course. Both type 1 diabetics
and type 2 diabetics require pharmacological treatment adapted to their
diet (Gonzáles-Barranco, 1998).
The main objectives of nutritional therapy in patients are:
• the maintenance of normal blood glucose concentrations
• the attainment of normal serum lipid concentrations
• an adequate caloric intake and, if necessary, weight reduction
• the prevention and treatment of complications such as autonomous polyneuropathy,
high blood pressure and cardiovascular diseases.
To prevent extreme blood sugar fluctuations, the diabetic should eat
several small meals distributed over the course of the day. The timing
of the meals and the amount of food eaten (especially the amount of carbohydrates)
have to be coordinated with the insulin dosage. This strategy results
in enhanced insulin sensitivity; in type 2 diabetics, it contributes
to weight reduction.
The recommendations issued for the food intake of patients with diabetes
mellitus have changed repeatedly since the beginning of the last century.
In the 1920s diabetics were advised to meet up to 70% of their total
energy requirements from fats in order to burden the metabolism with
as little carbohydrate as possible. Since the dietary regimen was associated
with an increased incidence of disorders of lipid metabolism, however,
and better control of postprandial blood glucose levels was available
with the advent of insulin therapy, it fell gradually into disfavor.
In the 1980s the recommendations of the German Diabetes Association (GDA)
were liberalized and brought into line for the most part with the guidelines
of the German Nutrition Society.
In 1994 the ADA and the European Association of the Study of Diabetes
(ESD) revamped the general principles of diabetic nutrition. The most
recent recommendations of the German Diabetes Association are based on
these guidelines and have been revised to take account of recent scientific
data. The following survey of general dietary recommendations for diabetics
corresponds to the recommendations of the GDA (GDA, 2000).
Year
Distribution of Calories among the Main Food Groups (%)
Carbohydrates
Proteins
Fats
Prior to 1921
Hunger Diet (deficient nutrition)
Table 6: Historical survey of dietary recommendations
for diabetics (ADA, 2000) *1) carbohydrates and simple unsaturated fatty
acids together 60-70% * 2) < 10% saturated and polyunsaturated fatty
acids
Total energy intake
The energy requirements of diabetics are no different from those of
their healthy counterparts. Since approx. 80% of type 2 diabetics are
obese (Hoffmann, 1998), however, many diabetics are advised to curtail
their energy intake in order to achieve weight reduction. Furthermore,
their goal should be to lessen their intake of foods with a high energy
density, especially foods of this kind with a high fat content. The intake
of simple unsaturated fatty acids has been largely liberalized.
Proteins
Diabetics, like healthy persons, are advised a total energy intake from
protein of 10-20 %. A higher protein intake increases the risk of developing
nephropathy. In patients with incipient or advanced nephropathy, the
daily protein intake should not exceed 0.8 g/kg of body weight.
Carbohydrates and fats
Some 80-90% of total calories should be obtained from carbohydrates
and fats. Less than 10% of this energy should come from saturated fatty
acids and less than 10% from polyunsaturated fatty acids. It follows
that the rest of the energy requirements must be supplied by carbohydrates
and simple unsaturated fatty acids. The optimal ratio of these two food
groups depends on the extent the patient´s obesity, his or her
LDL and triglyceride concentrations in serum, and the behavior of the
blood glucose concentration or insulin requirements. Trans-fatty acids,
which are contained in solidified fats and in deep fried foods, should
be avoided if it at all possible since they have an especially negative
effect on blood lipid values. The daily intake of cholesterol should
not be more than 300 mg/day.
When choosing carbohydrates, the diabetic should display a distinct
preference for foods with a low glycemic index in order to counteract
overly large postprandial blood sugar fluctuations. In general this means
an increased intake of starch-rich foods containing a high percentage
of dietary fiber. A moderate amount of sugar (e.g. fructose) can be included
in the diet of both type 1 and type 2 diabetics. However, the sugar consumption
should not account for more than 10% of total energy consumption and
should preferably be eaten together with other foods.
According to the GDA recommendations, carbohydrate consumption should
be reduced to approx. 45% of total energy intake only in patients with
poorly managed diabetes; in other diabetic patients, it can account for
up to 55% of total energy intake. However, the total fat consumption
should not account for more than 35% of energy intake; up to 20% of daily
energy requirements can be met with simple unsaturated fats can accounts
(GDA, 2000).
Vitamins and antioxidant foods
An adequate intake of both fat- and water-soluble vitamins is vital
for diabetics and healthy individuals. In patients with diabetes mellitus,
however, a sufficient supply of antioxidant nutrients such as tocopherols,
carotinoids, vitamin C and flavonoids is especially important since these
substances are able to lessen oxidative stress (Cf. 2.4) (4.5 and 4.6).
Minerals
Like the members of the general population, diabetic are urged to limit
their intake of table salt to less than 6 g per day. This is especially
important for patients with a metabolic syndrome, i.e. who also suffer
from elevated blood pressure, in order to lower their risk of developing
cardiovascular disease. With respect to other minerals, the recommendations
of the GDA do not deviate from the dietary recommendations for the general
public. Nevertheless, there is evidence that chromium, a trace element,
can exert a positive effect on diabetic metabolism (Cf. 4.7).
Whereas type 1 diabetics have a categorical dependence on insulin, patients
with the type 2 variant of the disease have several therapeutic options
open to them.
Pharmacological therapy is instituted in type 2 diabetics after dietary
modification and regular physical exercise are no longer sufficient to
bring the patient´s blood sugar levels close to normal values.
Initially, oral anti-diabetic preparations are preferred; these drugs
to not increase the secretion of insulin (i.e. belong to the group of
non-insulinotropic diabetes agents); instead, they lower blood sugar
via other pharmacological mechanisms. At later stages of the disease,
the patient may have to take oral diabetes drugs which increase the endogenous
secretion of insulin, i.e. insulinotropic diabetes agents.
If the type 2 diabetes progresses further, endogenous insulin production
may break down completely, causing an absolute deficiency of insulin
similar to that experienced by the type 1 diabetic. Type 2 diabetics
who have reached this stage may have to receive exogenous insulin.
Class of diabetes agents
Mechanism of action
Active substance
a-glycosidase inhibitors
Slows down the absorption of carbohydrates in the intestines
* Acarbose
* Miglitol
Biguanide
Raises the insulin sensitivity of the cells (among other effects)
* Metformin
Sulfonylurea
Stimulates insulin secretion by the pancreas
* Glibenclamide
* Glimepiride
Postprandial glucose regulators
Stimulates the release of insulin by the pancreas triggered by food intake
* Nateglinide
* Repaglinide
Thiazolidindione
Raises the insulin sensitivity of muscle and fat cells
* Rosiglitazone
* Pioglitazone
Table 7: Groups of medication for the oral treatment
of diabetes mellitus
a-glycosidase inhibitors
These preparations (acarbose and miglitol) act in the intestine to inhibit
the activity of ß-glycosidase responsible for the breakdown of
oligo- and polysaccharides into glucose. As a result, carbohydrate metabolism
is slowed down while glucose absorption and the rise in blood sugar are
delayed. Acarbose and metformin can be administered in combination with
sulfonylurea and insulin, respectively.
Biguainide
Biguanide (metformin) affects blood sugar regulation at several levels.
It causes a delay in enteral glucose absorption, an increase in hepatic
gluconeogenesis due to the enhanced insulin sensitivity of the cells,
and an increase in glucose uptake by the muscles. Since it does not have
any direct effect on insulin production or secretion, however, its action
is dependent on the presence of insulin for its effect. Apart from its
blood-sugar-lowering action, metformin also has a positive effect on
blood lipid values; in particular, it lowers the VLDL concentration in
plasma (Lohmann, 1993).
Sulfonylurea
The preparations in this class of substances stimulate the ß-cells
of the pancreas to secrete larger amounts of insulin. They are administered
to patients in whom dietary measures alone are not sufficient to guarantee
satisfactory metabolic management but who are as a rule still able to
produce sufficient amounts of insulin. Patients who have been taking
sulfonylurea for several years frequently develop " secondary failureö;
this means that they no longer respond optimally to the therapy and have
greater difficulty keeping their blood sugar levels under control. Secondary
failure is due to a decrease in the population of functioning ß-cells
and the patient´s failure to adhere to the prescribed diet (Haupt
et al, 1999).
Postprandial blood glucose regulators
This group of active substances consists of rapid-acting oral diabetes
agents which are taken shortly before meals to reduce postprandial hypoglycemia.
Like sulfonylurea, they stimulate the secretion of insulin by the pancreas;
however, they take effect faster but also shorter. Postprandial glucose
regulators effectively regulate both postprandial and fasting blood sugar
and cause periods of postprandial hypoglycemia (due to the overproduction
of insulin) to a far lesser extent than sulfonylurea. They can be administered
in the form of a monotherapy or in combination with metformin (Van Gaal
et al, 2001).
Insulin sensitizers (thiazolidindione, glitazone)
Since type 2 diabetes frequently occurs in combination with the metabolic
syndrome, scientists had long been searching for a medication that could
provide comprehensive treatment of all elements of the metabolic syndrome.
The glitazones have been on the market in Germany since 2000; these substances
simultaneously act on the blood sugar level and inhibit the degradation
of lipids in fatty tissue. They reduce the release of free fatty acids
and reduce VLDL synthesis in the liver. An anti-hypertensive effect has
also been demonstrated. The glitazones act at the level of gene expression
and decrease insulin resistance by improving the insulin sensitivity
of the liver, skeletal muscle cells and fat cells (Klinikarzt, 2000).
Insulin therapy
In patients with an absolute insulin deficiency (type 1) or declining
insulin secretion (type 2), insulin must be administered to keep the
patient´s metabolism under control. Insulin therapy has been employed
since the discovery of insulin in 1922; during this period it has been
improved continuously by the development of new insulin preparations.
Whereas diabetics had to rely on insufficiently purified swine and bovine
insulin during the early decades of insulin therapy, insulin of animal
origin has now been largely replaced by highly purified semisynthetic
and recombinant insulins.
The numerous products on the market fall into three main groups: products
with a rapid onset of action and short duration of action (normal insulin,
regular insulin), suspensions of human insulin with a delayed onset and
extended duration of action (depot or delayed action insulin) and mixtures
of the two (combination insulin). In addition, so-called insulin analogues
have been introduced in recent years; changes in the amino acid sequence
distinguish these insulins from human insulins. Moreover, insulin analogues
exhibit altered pharmacokinetics.
The goal of insulin therapy is to imitate the physiological secretion
of insulin by the pancreas as closely as possible in order to postpone
diabetic complications such as nephropathy, retinopathy and peripheral
neuropathy. This goal is best achieved with the intensified insulin therapy
which is now the treatment of choice for diabetics. This therapy consists
of a flexible therapeutic regimen geared to the patient´s normal
meals; in contrast to the rigid traditional therapy which has been largely
abandoned, it dispenses with a rigid diabetic diet. However, the intensified
insulin therapy places high demands on patient cooperation. This includes
measuring the blood glucose concentration three or more times a day in
order to determine the required insulin dose.
4. Optimized Nutritional Therapy within
the Framework of Enteral Nutrition
About 10% of all hospitalized patients have diabetes; of this total,
approx. 85% have type 2 (Coulson, 2000). It has been estimated that 25%
of all critically ill patients who are dependent on enteral or parenteral
nutrition have a diabetic metabolism (Wright, 2000).
Despite many years of intense research, the life expectancy of diabetics
is limited because of the occurrence of serious sequelae and acute complications
(Cf. 2.3 and 2.4). More than 50% of diabetics die of coronary heart disease
and 25% of strokes. Together microangiopathy and macroangiopathy account
for 80% of all deaths in diabetics (Karsten, 1999). A retrospective study
carried out in Brazil came to the conclusion that diabetics receiving
enteral nutrition had a significantly higher mortality than tube-fed
non-diabetics. The metabolic complications that frequently occurred in
diabetics receiving enteral nutrition included hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia,
ketoacidosis and hyperlipoproteinemia (Borges & Dudha, 1998).
The therapeutic objectives of any enteral nutrition regimen targeted
at diabetic patients are:
• to attain or maintain an optimal nutritional state
• to prevent acute and chronic complications by optimal management of the
patient´s metabolism.
4.1 Special features of an enteral
nutrition regimen for patients with diabetes mellitus
Enteral nutrition is indicated on the basis of certain primary diagnoses
(e.g. dysphagia, resection procedures); however, the concomitant diagnosis
of diabetes mellitus has far-reaching implications for the selection
of the dietary components, the access route and form of application as
well as for the coordination of diet and medication.
Gastroparesis, gastric emptying disorders
Gastroparesis is a symptom of autonomous neuropathy; its incidence and
severity are closely linked to the previous duration of the patient´s
diabetes mellitus an the quality of his or her blood sugar management.
In view of the above, it is important to assess the extent of diabetics
complications in any diabetic patient requiring enteral nutrition. The
combination of gastroparesis and enteral nutrition, for example, presents
the following risks:
• The intake of foods through gastric tubes can trigger vomiting, which
poses the risk of aspiration.
• In patients receiving enteral nutrition, it is more difficult to coordinate
the patient´s medication with his or her carbohydrate absorption; as a
result, both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia are possible.
• In post-aggression metabolic states, e.g. following surgery, metabolic
changes occur which can promote or intensify hyperglycemia. This acute metabolic
disturbance can in turn acutely exacerbate a pre-existing gastric emptying disorder.
• In a diabetic patient suffering from gastroparesis, the gastric emptying
difficulties normally encountered after surgery can be prolonged.
• In patients with renal insufficiency as well, the resulting uremia can
further exacerbate the gastroparesis.
• In patients with extremely severe gastroparesis, it may prove impossible
to bring the patient´s blood sugar levels under control. In such cases,
the gastroparesis alone may constitute an indication for the duodenal or jejeunal
application of enteral nutrition formulas.
Therapeutic options
• Enteral feeding via gastric tubes should be employed only in
stable patients with no signs of a gastric emptying disorder.
• In patients with acute clinical states, supplemental enteral nutrition
formulas should be administered through a jejeunal tube; in such cases, pump-controlled
application is indispensable.
• Continuous food intake even in patients on a long-term enteral nutrition
regimen (e.g. stroke and diabetic patients)
• Regular management of gastric emptying during the administration of supplemental
enteral nutrition formulas as well as during the further clinical course (documentation)
• Close monitoring of blood sugar to prevent an acute worsening of the
gastroparesis and hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia.
• If required, medication with a propulsive effect – such as metoclopramide
or domperidone – should also be administered.
(Charney, 1998; McMahon & Rizza, 1996; Nonpleggi et al, 1989)
Blood sugar management and monitoring in patients receiving
enteral nutrition
In all tube-fed patients, exact monitoring of blood sugar and blood
lipid values is extremely important. In addition to close monitoring,
the use of a suitable balanced diet is decisive (Gallagher-Allred & O´Doriso,
1998; see below).
A special feature of the use of enteral nutrition in diabetics is the
effect of liquid nourishment on blood sugar levels. Liquids and liquid
dietary components pass through the stomach faster than solid dietary
components (Fig. 5). Speeder gastric emptying results in a faster breakdown
and absorption of dietary constituents in the small intestine and thus
to more rapid absorption of glucose.
Fig. 5 Dynamics of the passage of dietary constituents
from the stomach into the duodenum via gastric emptying in healthy persons
(Berger, 1995)
Cashmere et al (1981) compared the rise in blood sugar and insulin following
the ingestion of a portion (500 kcal) of enteral nutrition formula via
a gastric tube and after the ingestion of a solid meal containing the
same number of calories and amount of carbohydrate. The highest blood
glucose concentration was measured after 30 minutes in both cases; however,
the curve was relatively flat following the ingestion of solid food.
Furthermore, the amount of insulin in the blood was higher after the
administration of enteral nutrition formulas via a tube. From these observations,
the conclusion can be drawn that dietary constituents are absorbed more
quickly from liquid formulas than from solid foods and result in greater
fluctuations in blood sugar than do solid foods (Campbell & Schiller,
1991).
The coordination of medication and the administration of enteral nutrition
should take account of the following factors:
• amount of carbohydrate
• form of enteral application
- administration of a bolus
- intermittent feeding or
- continuous feeding
• choice of medication: insulin (normal insulin or delayed-action insulin)
and possibly oral diabetes agents
• clinical course and impact of therapy
- acute phase of the disease, stable condition
- dietary supplementation, transitional forms
(parenteral ? enteral ?oral nutrition)
- long-term enteral nutrition
To manage blood sugar values during the administration of enteral nutrition
in acute disease phases, normal insulin should be used. Since enteral
nutrition formulas are generally fed continuously via pumps, insulin
can be administered via a perfusor. Insulin should not be added to the
enteral nutrition formula under any circumstances.
During the phase of enteral nutritional supplementation, the patient´s
medication should be continuously adjusted to the amount of nutrients
administered; during transitions from parenteral or oral nutrition to
enteral nutrition, the total quantity of nutrients administered by all
routes should be taken into account. Over-feeding should be avoided.
In patients whose total energy requirements are met by tube-feeding
and patients receiving continuous long-term enteral nutrition, a switch
from normal insulin to delayed-action insulin (or analog insulins) is
indicated. If the enteral nutrition therapy is administered intermittently
over a long period (e.g. in the form of a bolus, short-action insulin
(normal insulin or insulin analogue) should be used. The time span between
injection and food intake should be shortened since carbohydrates ingested
in liquid form (see above) are absorbed more rapidly.
Patients with stable type 2 diabetes can be treated with oral diabetes
agents; in this case the type of tube used (i.e. gastric or jejeunal)
determines the choice of medication (galenic form) and route of application.
(Charney, 1998; McMahon & Rizza, 1996; Nompleggi et al, 1989).
To prevent long term complications, optimal blood sugar control should
be ensured, especially in patients on a long-term enteral nutrition regimen,
by a sufficient number of blood sugar readings and therapy adapted to
the requirements of the individual patient. Blood sugar and HbA1c should
be monitored regularly
Hygiene and risk of infection
The frequent occurrence of hyperglycemia or hyperinsulinemia in diabetic
patients causes direct complications and long term complications. Numerous
in vitro studies have demonstrated that hyperglycemia can trigger abnormal
immunological defense mechanisms. In addition, frequent periods of hyperglycemia
have been identified as an independent risk factor predisposing to the
development of infections (McMahon, 1996). Conversely, an acute abnormal
blood sugar level may be a sign of infection. Optimal blood sugar management
helps to lower the risk of infection.
In all patients receiving enteral nutrition, in addition, special attention
must be paid to hygienic handling of the enteral nutrition formula, regular
replacement of the administration sets, and meticulous care of the enteral
access.
A comprehensive diabetic treatment concept
In 1998 an international committee of experts issued a Consensus Statement
on the use of enteral nutrition in diabetics (Consensus Statement, 1998).
The main objectives of therapeutic planning cited by the statement were:
optimal blood sugar management and general metabolic monitoring in order
to achieve both short-term and long-term therapeutic goals and to prevent
long term complication of diabetes. To achieve the overall goal of optimal
treatment, a systematic approach to history-taking, therapeutic planning
and therapeutic monitoring are necessary. This sort of approach should
take account of:
• the nutritional and metabolic status of the patient
• gastrointestinal dysfunction, e.g. gastroparesis
• selection of a suitable enteral access
• selection of a suitable application form for the enteral nutrition
• coordination of pharmacological therapy and enteral nutrition
• the setting-down of parameters to be monitored and the frequency of monitoring
• selection of a suitable enteral nutrition formula (composition).
4.2 Composition of balanced diets
for patients with diabetes mellitus
Standard diets contain relatively large amounts of easy-to-absorb carbohydrates;
some of them contain a low percentage of dietary fiber and a fat composition
which is not optimal for diabetic patients with abnormal lipid metabolism.
The first enteral nutrition formulas designed especially for diabetics
were put on the market in the 1990s; these are not totally in line with
the most recent recommendations for diabetics (Cf. 3.1) (Coulston, 1998).
For this reason, special liquid formulas and formulas for tube feeding
are required which satisfy the current nutritional recommendations for
diabetics and promote optimal metabolic management (Table 8).
Standard
First generation diabetes diets
Current dietary recommen dations
for diabetics (GDA)
Nutricomp Diabetes
(B. Braun)
Carbohydrates
%
50-58
48-55
< 55-60
52
Dietary fiber
g
-
30-33
increase intake
30
Fat
%
24-35
30-37
< 35
32
MUFA:PUFA
%
1:1
1:2.3
> 3:1
3.5:1
MUFA
%
6-8
10-20
20
Protein
%
14-18
15
10-20
16
Carbohydrate + MUFA
%
56-62
60-70
70
Table 8: Distribution of nutrients in balanced standard
diets meeting nutritional requirements, first-generation special diabetes
diets (without an increased percentage of unsaturated fatty acids) and
Nutricomp Diabetes (B. Braun) in comparison with the current nutritional
recommendations for diabetics issued by the German Diabetes Association
(GDA) (MUFA: simple unsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty
acids, CH: carbohydrates)
In accordance with current dietary recommendations, the latest generation
of balanced diets for diabetics derive 60-70% of the nutrition energy
from carbohydrate with a low glycemic effect and from mono-unsaturated
fatty acids. Saturated fatty acids and polyunsaturated fatty acids each
account of < 10% of the energy intake. A high percentage of dietary
fiber, a dose of antioxidant vitamins in line with requirements, and
the addition of phytochemicals as well as chromium add up to an optimal
diet for diabetics, one that has numerous positive effects on their particular
metabolic situation (Table 9).
The carbohydrate intake of diabetics was a matter of controversy for
many years (Cf. 3.1). Today large organizations such as ADA or EASD are
in agreement that optimal carbohydrate intake is an individual matter:
however, carbohydrates and simple unsaturated fatty acids should account
for 60-70% of total energy intake. The GDA recommends that diabetics
meet up to 55% of their total energy requirements with carbohydrates.
The composition of the carbohydrates given to a patient is at least
as important as the amount. Carbohydrates with a low glycemic index (Cf.
2.2.1) and high percentage of dietary fiber should be chosen in order
to keep the rise in blood sugar as small as possible.
Balanced diets based on the requirements of diabetic patients should
not contain any easy-to-absorb carbohydrates. What is recommended instead
is a high percentage of complex carbohydrates in the form of starches
and a high percentage of dietary fiber. The inclusion of moderate amounts
of fructose and prebiotic oligosaccharides can exert an additional positive
effect on the diabetic´s metabolism.
Starch serves as the storage carbohydrate in many plants and is the
most important food carbohydrate. It consists of numerous glucose molecules
linked to form either unbranched molecules (e.g. amylose) or branched
molecules (e.g. amylopectin) (Franzke, 1996). In the small intestine
the largest part of the ingested starch is broken down by the digestive
enzymes into individual glucose molecules which are then absorbed by
the body. A significant portion of the ingested starch manages to avoid
enzymatic degradation in the small intestine, however, and reaches the
large intestine; here it is fermented by the intestinal flora (Cf. dietary
fiber). The starch fraction which passes through the small intestine
without being digested is referred to as "resistant starchö (Concepts
for Modulating the Intestinal Flora, Special Issue, Practical Application
of Clinical Nutrition, B. BRAUN).
Starch exerts a positive effect on the glycemic control of the diabetic
patient. The underlying mechanism has not been fully elucidated. It is
suspected, however, that the ingested starches and lipids interact to
form complexes which slow down the hydrolysis of amylose and thus the
absorption of glucose (Stürmer, 1984).
Stiller et al. (1993) investigated the metabolic effects of a balanced
diet for type 2 diabetics with a modified carbohydrate component. This
team was able to verify that the inclusion of starches and fructose instead
of easily digestible carbohydrate in enteral nutrition formulas exerted
a positive effect on postprandial blood glucose and serum insulin concentrations.
A comparison of the group receiving the test diet and the control group
showed no differences in triglyceride and cholesterol levels.
Fructose is a simple sugar found in the normal human diet primarily
in the form of sucrose (one molecule of sucrose consists of one molecule
of glucose plus one molecule of fructose). Small amounts of free fructose
can be found in fruit. Fructose is absorbed in the intestines, owing
to its easier diffusion, and is transported directly to the liver, where
it is taken up by the hepatocytes. This uptake of fructose by the hepatocytes
is dependent on insulin. As a result, fructose does not accumulate in
the blood of diabetics or healthy subjects. In the liver fructose can
be metabolized without prior conversion; in other tissues, however, it
is converted first to glucose (Rehner and Daniel, 1999).
Fructose may be utilized in the enteral nutrition of diabetics because
it triggers a lower rise in blood sugar and a weaker insulin response
than, for example, glucose or maltodextrin (Schrezenmeir, 1998). The
same conclusion was reached by Koivisto & Yki-Jarvinen (1993) in
a placebo-controlled double-blind study on the effect of fructose on
glycemic control, blood lipid values and insulin secretion in type 2
diabetics. This group of researchers administered 45-65 kg of fructose
a day to the test subjects for a total of four weeks. During the fructose
diet the HbA1c value and insulin sensitivity of the subjects rose by
34%. No effects on blood lipid values were observed.
The intake of large amounts of fructose can have detrimental effects
on blood triglyceride levels and can cause diarrhea or elevated uric
acid concentrations. A diet containing moderate amounts of fructose,
i.e. amounts accounting for less than 20% of total energy intake, is
not expected to produce side effects of this kind (Schrezenmeir, 1998;
Stürmer et al, 1994).
Experts in nutritional physiology define dietary fiber as food ingredients
derived from plants which are not degraded (or degraded to only a slight
extent) by human digestive enzymes in the small intestine and are therefore
not absorbed (or absorbed to only a slight extent). These substances
reach the large intestine, where they undergo bacterial fermentation
for the most part. Today we know that there is a direct correlation between
a diet low in fiber and numerous civilization-related diseases such as
overweight, disorders of lipid metabolism, aortosclerosis, type 2 diabetes
and gastrointestinal problems such as constipation, intestinal cancer
or diverticulosis (Elmadfa and Leitzmann, 1998).
A distinction is made between water-soluble and water-insoluble fiber-containing
substances. Water-soluble dietary fiber is broken down rapidly and almost
completely by the anaerobic intestinal flora (intestinal bacteria). During
this process short chain fatty acids are released which exert a wide
variety of positive effects on the organism. The water-soluble fiber-containing
substances include pectin, various plant gums, mucin and prebiotic carbohydrates
such as inulin and oligofructose (see below). The water-insoluble fiber-containing
substances, in contrast, are hardly fermented at all. Owing to their
high water-binding capacity, they increase stool volume; this stimulates
peristalsis and shortens transit time in the large intestine. These substances
consist mainly of cellulose and hemicellulose (Kasper, 2000; Elmadfa
and Leitzmann, 1998).
It is especially important for the diet of diabetics to include a high
percentage of soluble fiber-containing substances since this dietary
fiber fraction can lower cholesterol values and, in addition, exert positive
effects on the blood glucose level. Chandalia et al (2000) investigated
the effect of the ingestion of an increased percentage of dietary fiber
in 13 type 2 diabetics. They compared the impact of two different diets
on the blood glucose concentrations and cholesterol values of these patients.
Whereas Diet 1 contained only 8 g of soluble dietary fiber, Diet 2 contained
25 g. It was discovered that Diet 2 lowered the postprandial blood glucose
concentration, the areas under the curve of the 24-hour glucose and insulin
concentration and plasma levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride and
LDL cholesterol. In particular, the researchers attributed this effect
to the larger dietary fiber fraction. The lowering of the pH in the colon
lumen as a result of the increased production of short chain fatty acids
is presumed to constitute the mechanism responsible for this cholesterol-lowering
effect. At low pH values the bile acids (formed from cholesterol) become
non-soluble and are secreted in the stool. Cholesterol is removed from
the enterohepatic cycle in this fashion. The impact on blood sugar concentration
is attributed to the increased viscosity and the slowing down of starch
digestion (D.I.E.T., 2001).
The non-soluble types of dietary fiber also exhibit effects in the gastrointestinal
tract from which diabetics can profit, especially during long periods
of tube-feeding. In particular, older patients being tube-fed for longer
periods of time frequently develop unpleasant complications such as diarrhea
and digestive problems (Shankardass et al, 1990). Numerous studies have
shown that increasing the percentage of dietary fiber in enteral nutrition
formulas can both decrease the average incidence and duration of diarrhea
in tube-feed patients (Guenter et al, 1991; Bass, 1996) and in general
improve the patients´ health (Khali et al, 1998).
According to these studies, dietary fiber exerts a multifaceted positive
effect on the metabolism and gut health of diabetics. Supplementing the
formulas used for tube feeding with dietary fiber can decrease the risk
of diabetic long term complications such as cardiovascular disease and
microangiopathies by lowering blood sugar and blood lipid values. Moreover,
the positive effect on intestinal motility is beneficial, especially
for patients who already display complications in the form of polyneuropathies
(e.g. gastroparesis) (Cf. 2.4.3).
Prebiotics are by definition non-digestible dietary constituents which
can benefit the host organism (i.e. the human being) by stimulating the
growth and/or activity of one or several colon bacteria and thus the
promote the health of the host (Gibson & Collins, 1999). The group
of prebiotic carbohydrate includes a number of oligosaccharides, of which
inulin and oligofructose are most frequently employed.
The human intestinal flora consists of billions of individual intestinal
bacteria which exert beneficial and less beneficial effects on the health
of the human being who is their host. One group of intestinal microflora
with an especially beneficial effect are the lactic acid bacteria (Gibson & Roberfroid,
1995). The prebiotic carbohydrates inulin and oligofructose stimulate
primarily the growth of bifidobacteria. This phenomenon, referred to
as the "bifidogenic effectö, causes a number of effects which
promote the host´s health:
Local effects
Systemic effects
? Fecal secretion
? Cholesterol & triglycerides
? Bacterial
population (selective)
? Immune function
? Production
of SCFA
? Insulin ? blood
glucose
? Absorption
of minerals
? Uric acid
? Synthesis
of B vitamins
? NH3
Table 10: Potential effects of prebiotics (in modified
form from Jenkins, 1999)
Two effects of particular interest to diabetics receiving enteral nutrition,
in addition to the general positive effects on intestinal motility, are
the lowering of postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations and the
reduction of cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Although the exact
mechanisms impacting lipid and glucose metabolism have not yet been fully
clarified, the results have been confirmed in numerous studies on animals
and human beings (Delzenne & Kok, 2001).
Detailed information on prebiotic carbohydrates and their mechanism
of action can be found in the publication "Concepts for Modulating
the Intestinal Floraö (B. BRAUN, 2001).
The recommendation given diabetics at the end of the 19th century, namely
to maintain a high fat intake, was abandoned in the wake of further research
on diabetes (Cf. 3.1). Over 100 years later, however, a higher fat intake
has been correlated with improved glycemic control and better blood triglyceride
and blood lipid values. In particular, an increased percentage of simple
unsaturated fatty acids is now advocated since these have been shown
to promote better management of blood glucose and blood lipid values.
Moreover, the regular intake of polyunsaturated omega-3-fatty acids in
the form of fish oils has been shown to exert beneficial effects on the
metabolism of diabetic patients. Saturated fatty acids which have a negative
effect on the diabetic´s triglyceride and lipid profile should
be eaten in only small amounts, i.e. should account for < 10% of total
energy intake, and trans-fatty acids should be avoided completely. This
kind of fatty acids, which occur especially in solidified fats, raises
the concentration of LDL cholesterol and Lp(a) lipoproteins and lowers
the HDL cholesterol level. This constellation increases the risk of cardiovascular
disk immensely (Katsilambros, 2001).
Whereas the diabetic who can eat normally often finds it difficult to
include a precisely defined fatty acid combination in his or her diet,
the lipid constituents of a enteral nutrition formula can be tailored
exactly to the requirements of the diabetic patient (Schrezenmeir, 1998).
The majority of type 2 diabetic patients display hyperlipoproteinemia
in addition to elevated blood sugar values. Characteristic of this condition
are elevated total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels, an elevated
triglyceride concentration and a comparatively low HDL cholesterol concentration
in plasma. An altered plasma lipid profile increases the risk of microvascular
changes (Cf. 4.3) in diabetic patients many times over (Schrezenmeir,
1998).
Numerous studies performed in recent years have shown that the partial
replacement of carbohydrates by mono-unsaturated fatty acids in balanced
diets for diabetics can have a positive effect on blood lipid levels.
With respect to lipid metabolism, an increased intake of mono-unsaturated
fatty acids is corelated with:
• a lowering of the total cholesterol level
• a lowering of the LDL cholesterol level
• a lowering of the plasma triglyceride concentration
• a moderate increase in HDL cholesterol
• the production of forms of LDL having a lesser atherogenic effect (Katsilambros,
2001).
Apart from the positive effects on blood lipids, enteral nutrition formulas
containing a comparatively high percentage of fat, in particular a higher
concentration of mono-unsaturated fatty acids, ensures a better glycemic
control in diabetics (Schrezenmeir, 1998). Furthermore, there is evidence
that mono-unsaturated fatty acids possess antioxidant potential and,
in particular, can change the decrease the oleic acid oxidation reaction
in the body. Further studies will have to be carried out to explore the
long-term effects of a diet rich in mono-unsaturated fatty acids on oxidative
stress in diabetics (Berry, 1997).
In a placebo-controlled double-blind study lasting for three months,
Craig et al (1998) demonstrated that patients on a fat-modified diet
containing a high percentage of mono-unsaturated fatty acids exhibited
markedly fewer infections and decubitus ulcers during the observation
period. These results point to the possibility of improving the clinical
outcome and life quality in these patients via modified enteral nutrition.
A diet with an increased fat fraction is generally associated with a
higher caloric intake and thus weight gain. A cohort study performed
by Shah and Garg (1996) showed that moderately increasing the proportion
of fat in the diet of overweight diabetics by adding mono-unsaturated
fatty acids did not result in weight gain unless the energy intake was
increased at the same time. Interventional studies on weight loss failed
to demonstrate that hypocaloric carbohydrate-rich diet resulted in higher
weight loss than hypocaloric fat-rich diets. In view of these results,
balanced diets rich in unsaturated fatty acids can be recommended for
obese type 2 diabetics with impunity provided that the patients´ energy
intake is monitored at the same time.
In patients receiving enteral nutrition, however, the recommended fat
fraction of 35% and a total energy fraction of up to 20% consisting of
simple unsaturated fatty acids should not be exceeded despite the positive
effects this type of fatty acid exerts (GDA, 2000). In patients being
treated with sulfonylurea (Cf. 3.2), in particular, an extremely elevated
fat intake (> 50%) can lead to complications as a result of the increased
ketone body production (Sanz-Paris, 1998).
The regular inclusion of fish in the diet, or the use of fish oil dietary
supplements, is associated with a decreased incidence of coronary heart
disease. This is attributed to the positive effect of omega-3-fatty acids
on lipid metabolism (Prince & Deeg, 1997).
Several studies performed with diabetic patients have demonstrated that
omega-3 fatty acids reduce the concentrations of total triglycerides,
VLDL triglycerides and VLDL cholesterol. Several possible mechanisms
have been postulated, including the suppression of VLDL production in
the liver and heightened activity of lipoprotein lipase (degradation
of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins) by fish oils (Prince & Deeg, 1997).
The question of whether omega-3 fatty acids exert a negative effect
on blood sugar management in diabetics was long a matter of controversy.
A meta-analysis of 18 randomized placebo-controlled studies carried out
with 823 type 2 diabetics (Montori et al, 2000) showed that supplementing
the diet with 3-18 g of fish oil for 12 weeks caused an average drop
of 49 mg/dl in serum triglycerides; the increase was even greater, i.e.
64 mg/dl, in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Fasting blood sugar
and HbA1c were not significantly affected by the ingestion of fish oil.
The conclusion to be drawn from these results is that the addition of
fish oil to the diet of type 2 diabetics can improve the dyslipemia frequently
found in this group of patients without having a detrimental effect on
blood sugar.
An anti-arteriosclerotic effect is ascribed to the omega-3 fatty acids
in addition to their ability to lower blood lipids. Owing to the increased
intake of eicosapentanoic acid (omega-3 fatty acid), the production of "series
3ö prostaglandins and thromboxanes can be stepped up; these are
substances which modulate signal transduction (Rehner & Daniel, 1999),
dilate blood vessels, prevent platelet aggregation, etc. As a result,
blood pressure is lowered and blood viscosity reduced (Mutanen & Freese
1996; Brown & Hu, 2001).
Because of the ease with which omega-3 fatty acids can be oxidized,
diabetics should consume only moderate amounts (i.e. < 10% of total
energy intake) of this type of fatty acid. If antioxidants such as vitamin
E (see below) are taken together with omega-3 fatty acids, peroxidation
reactions can be largely prevented (Saito, 2000).
Proteins are essential nutrients in the human diet. The quality of a
protein source depends on the amount of essential amino acids (amino
acids which cannot be synthesized by the organism itself) it contains
and their digestibility. The availability of amino acids varies according
to the protein source, degree of processing and interaction with other
dietary constituents. In general animal proteins display a higher availability
than plant proteins for the human organism (Elmadfa & Leitzmann,
1998); a high biological value can be achieved by a combination of animal
and plant proteins.
In enteral nutrition formulas, soy protein is frequently employed as
an additional protein source. Besides having a relatively high biological
value, soy protein is nutritionally valuable because of its high isoflavonoid
content. Consequently, the inclusion of soy protein in enteral nutrition
formulas for diabetics is highly recommended (Cf. 4.6).
There is abundant evidence to suggest that oxidative stress plays a
decisive role in the pathogenesis of diabetes and the development of
diabetics long term complications (e.g. arteriosclerosis, microangiopathy,
etc.). Diabetes mellitus leads to a weakening of the body´s antioxidant
defense mechanisms and the increased production of free radicals (Rösen
et al, 2001). The effects of supplementing the diet with substances possessing
a known antioxidant effect – such as vitamin E, vitamin C, vitamin
A and betacarotin – on the oxidative equilibrium of diabetics and
on the clinical outcome of their treatment have been explored in numerous
studies.
Investigating the susceptibility of lipoproteins (LDL) to oxidation
in type 2 diabetics in comparison with health subjects, Anderson et al
(1999) found an increased susceptibility. Subsequently, the diabetics
were given a placebo for eight weeks, a vitamin supplement containing
a-tocopherol, ß-carotene and vitamin C for 12 weeks, and then a
placebo again for 8 weeks. During the period in which vitamin supplements
with an antioxidant effect were administered, the susceptibility for
LDL oxidation dropped significantly.
In a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study performed by Preiser
et al (2000), 51 patients were tube-fed for seven days with either an
enteral nutrition formula supplemented with vitamins A, C and E or with
an isocaloric formula without the vitamin supplements. The patients receiving
vitamin supplements displayed a distinctly improved resistance to LDL
oxidation than the control group. Since oxidized LDL constitutes an important
risk factor for the development of aortosclerosis, we can conclude that
supplementing the diet with antioxidant substances such as vitamins A,
C and E and ß-carotene significantly lessens the risk of coronary
heart disease.
Phytochemicals are substances which serve as building blocks of organic
substances in the plant and as substrates for energy metabolism in humans.
They include carbohydrate (including dietary fiber), fats and proteins.
Phytochemicals, in contrast, are non-nutritive substances which serve
as defense substances, growth regulators or pigments in plants. In contrast
to the primary plant substance, they occur in only very small amounts.
Of the approx. 30,000 known phytochemicals, approx. 5,000 – 10,000
occur in the human diet. As part of the human diet they can exert either
health-promoting effects or effects which are detrimental to health (like
the toxic substance solanine found in the green spots in potatoes). In
recent years, the magnitude of the health-promoting effects, in particular,
has been recognized and investigated (Nutrition Report 1996).
The most important groups of substances with health-promoting effects
are:
It is assumed that these phytochemicals have a very broad spectrum of
action ranging from anti-carcinogenic, anti-microbial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory,
immunomodulatory and cholesterol-lowering to blood-glucose-regulating
and blood-pressure-regulating (Table 9). A person eating a normal healthy
diet takes in phytochemicals every day. These substances are present
in fluctuating amounts in fruit, vegetables, legumes and tea (especially
in unfermented green tea). Even though an absence of phytochemicals does
not lead to any acute deficiency symptoms (e.g. malnutrition or vitamin
deficiency), it presumably increases the long-term risk of developing
various diseases, e.g. cardiovascular disease, cancer and arteriosclerosis
(German Nutrition Report 1996).
Table 11: Types and effects of phytochemicals (taken
in modified form from the German Nutrition Report, 1996)
These substances can be added to enteral nutrition formulas so that
tube-fed patients do not have do without their positive effects.
Flavonoids
Flavonoids make up the largest group of plant phenols. All of the flavonoids
have a basic structure with three ring systems derived from flavane or
flavene. The vast majority of these substances are yellow (Latin: flavus
= yellow) compounds (Franzke, 1996). In situations where flavonoids temporarily
cannot be obtained from everyday foods such as fruits, vegetables and
grains, the diet can be supplemented with extracts of green tea, grape
seeds, citrus fruits or other plants.
There is evidence that the proanthocyanidine, a group of polyphenolic
bioflavonoids obtained from grape seed extract, exhibit a strong antioxidant
effect. After performing an in vitro study comparing the antioxidant
action of vitamins C and E and grape seed flavonoids, Bagchi et al (1997)
concluded that the flavonoids can trap free radicals far more effectively
than vitamins C and E. Another study, conducted by Bouhamidi et al (1998),
points to a sharp decrease in the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty
acids by small amounts of flavonoids from grape seed extract. A lessening
of oxidation reactions involving lipoproteins (LDL) was also observed
during an in vitro study using green tea extract (Yokozawa, 1997). During
in vivo trials performed with diabetic rats, moreover, citrus flavonoids
demonstrated an ability to reduce antioxidant stress (Miyake et al, 1998).
Furthermore, numerous studies carried out with human subjects attest
to the positive effect of an increased intake of flavonoids. Working
with a study population consisting of ten type 2 diabetics, Lean et al
(1999) administered first a low-flavonoid diet and then a flavonoid-rich
diet (e.g. by adding larger amounts of tea) for two consecutive weeks
each. During both two-week periods, the researchers investigated the
extent to which the DNA of the test subjects was damaged in vitro by
free radicals. The results showed that the DNA suffered significantly
less oxidative damage during the administration of the flavonoid-rich
diet than during the period without dietary supplementation with flavonoids.
In another study carried out with type 1 diabetics, the addition of flavonoids
resulted in a reduction of the HbA1c value (Manuel y Keenoy, 1999).
Isoflavonoids
It has already been known for some time know that a diet rich in soy
protein helps to improve blood lipid values, i.e. to lower LDL and total
cholesterol. The mechanism responsible for this effect has not yet been
fully elucidated. It is assumed that the isoflavonoids present in soy
protein, in particular, have a positive effect on lipid metabolism (Friedman & Brandon,
2001).
Potter et al (1998) and Washburn et al (1999) explored the role played
by soy isoflavonoids in lowering the risk of cardiovascular disease in
women with a diet rich in soy protein. They noted a significant improvement
in blood lipid values and blood pressure. The addition of isoflavonoids
to the diet of type 2 diabetics in the form of soy protein also had several
beneficial effects, including a significant reduction of LDL cholesterol
and triglyceride concentration in plasma (Hermansen et al, 2001).
It has been known for almost 40 years that chromium plays a role in
glucose regulation and lipid metabolism. In patients dependent on total
parenteral nutrition who suffered from chromium deficiency and were in
danger of developing insulin resistance, replacement therapy with chromium
III resulted in a normalization of the blood glucose concentration. Chromium
was credited with acting as a "glucose tolerance factorö (Anderson,
1999).
Studies have shown that plasma chromium concentrations are about one-third
lower on the average in diabetics than in healthy subjects and that chromium
excretion is increased by as much as 100%. It has been postulated that
the chromium deficiency building up in type 2 diabetics over a period
of years contributes to the development of the insulin resistance characteristic
of this group (Morris et al, 1999).
Chromium appears to play the role of a co-factor in the action of insulin.
It is a constituent of a chromium-binding substance known as "low-molecular-weight
chromium-binding substanceö (LMWCr) which, in combination with
insulin, performs a decisive function in the activation of the insulin
receptor. If not enough chromium is available to bind to the LMWCr, the
activation mechanism of the insulin receptor is impaired and insulin
resistance a possible consequence (Anderson, 1999; Vincent, 2000).
A study conducted by Anderson et al (1997) with 180 type 2 diabetics
provided impressive confirmation of the positive effect of chromium.
The subjects were given either a placebo (1), a dietary supplement containing
200 µg of chromium per day (2) or a dietary supplement containing
1,000 µg of chromium per day (3). In both groups receiving supplemental
chromium, the following quantities improved – in some cases significantly – within
two to four months: the HbA1c value, the glucose concentration and the
insulin value. In group (3), a decrease in the cholesterol level was
also observed after four months.
The chromium uptake of the general population is generally less than
50 µg daily; in diabetics, the amount lost daily (60-300 µg)
is distinctly greater than the intake (Müller, 2001). For this reason,
it is advisable to add extra chromium to any enteral nutrition formula
designed for diabetics. Nevertheless, the intake of chromium should not
exceed the currently recommended 200 µg per day (Jeejeebhoy, 1999).
In diabetes, optimized therapy is the basis for a good quality of life
and a longer life expectancy. In addition to pharmacological therapy,
nutritional therapy can bring about an additional improvement in the
metabolic status of the diabetic patient.
In diabetic patients on an enteral nutrition regimen involving liquid
formulas, meticulous monitoring of metabolic status is essential. The
nutrient composition of balanced diets should be tailored especially
to the requirements of the diabetic patient.
The carbohydrate components of enteral nutrition formulas for diabetics
should not contain any easily absorbed carbohydrates. Instead, starch
should be chosen as the main carbohydrate source. In combination with
fructose and dietary fiber, starch guarantees slower absorption of glucose
in the intestines, which makes it relatively easier to manage the patient´s
glycemic status. To improve the changed blood lipid values (hyperlipoproteinemia)
which occur in type 2 diabetics, in particular, it is advisable to increase
the percentage of mono-unsaturated fatty acids, add a moderate amount
of omega-3 fatty acids in the form of fish oil to the diet, and sharply
reduce the amount of saturated fatty acids in the enteral nutrition formula
used for tube feeding. A fat intake which is slightly increased in comparison
with standard diets also results in improved blood sugar management.
In addition to the main nutrients, a number of other nutrients – e.g.
phytochemicals, vitamins and minerals – play a role in improving
the metabolic status of the diabetics. An increased intake of vitamins
with an antioxidant effect can exert beneficial effects on oxidative
stress and its sequelae. A group of phytochemicals called flavonoids
also exert an impact on oxidative equilibrium and lessen injurious oxidation
reactions in the body. Furthermore, a group of phytochemicals derived
from soy protein called "isoflavonoidsö are able to improve
blood lipid values such as LDL and total cholesterol. An increased intake
chromium, one of the trace elements, also has a positive effect on the
management of the glycemic status of diabetic patients.
A balanced diet reflecting the latest scientific findings and recommendations
supports the management of the metabolic situation in diabetics patients
and can make a contribution to improving the clinical outcome.
ADA
Nutrition Recommendations and Principles for People With Diabetes Mellitus – Position
Statement.
Tenn Med 93,11 (200) 430-433
Anderson JW, Gowri MS, Turner J, Nichols L, Diwadkar VA, Chow CK, Oeltgen
PR
Antioxidant supplementation effects on low-density lipoprotein oxidation
for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Journal of the American College of Nutrition 18, 5 (1999) 451-461
Anderson RA
Chromium and diabetes
Nutrition 15,9 (1999) 720-722
Anderson RA, Cheng N, Bryden NA, Polansky MM, Cheng N, Chi J, Feng J
Elevated intakes of supplemental chromium improve glucose and insulin
variables in individuals with type 2 diabetes
Diabetes 46, 11 (1997) 1786-1791
Badenhoop K, Usadel K-H
Klassifikation und Genetik.
In: Mehnert H, Standl E, Usadel K-H (Ed) Diabetologie in Klinik und Praxis
4. Auflage
Thieme, Stuttgart (1999)
Bagchi D, Garg A, Krohn RL, Bagchi M, Tran MX, Stohs SJ
Oxigen free radical scavenging abilities of vitamin C and E, and a grape
seed proanthocyanidin extract in vitro.
Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol 95, 2 (1997) 179-189
Bass DJ, Forman LP, Abrams SE, Hsueh AM
The effect of dietary fiber in the tube-fed elderly patients.
J Gerontol Nurs 22, 10 (1996) 37-44
B. Braun
Konzepte zur Modulation der Darmflora.
Klinische Ernährung in der Anwendung, Sonderausgabe (2001)
Berger M
Diabetes Mellitus
Urban & Schwarzenberg, München (1995)
Berry E
Dietary fatty acids in the management of diabetes mellitus.
Am J Clin Nutr 66, suppl (1997) 991S-997S
Borges VC, Dudha A
The dietitian´s perspective: nutrition care of patients with diabetes
requiring nutrition support.
Clinical Nutrition 17, suppl (1998) 57-59
Bouhamadi R, Prevost V, Nouvelot A
High protection by grape seed proanthocyanidin (GSPC) of polyunsaturated
fatty acids against UV-induced peroxidation.
C R Acad Sci 321, 1 (1998) 31-38
Brown AA, Hu FB
Dietary modulation of endothelial function: implications for cardiovascular
disease.
Am J Clin Nutr 73 (2001) 673-686
Bruns W, Fiedler H
Diabetes mellitus: Klassifikation und Diagnostik nach Kriterien der WHO
1985 und der American Diabetes Association 1997.
VitaMinSpur 16 (2001) 83-90
Campbell SM, Schiller MR
Considerations for enteral nutrition support of patients with diabetes.
Top Clin Nutr 7, 1 (1991) 23-32
Chandalia M, Garg A, Lutjohann D, Bergmann K, Grundy SM, Brinkley LJ
Beneficial effects of high dietary fiber intake in patients with type
2 diabetes mellitus.
N Engl J Med 342, 19 (2000) 1392-1398
Chantelau E
Diät bei Diabetes mellitus.
In: Berger M (Ed). Diabetes mellitus.
Urban & Schwarzenberg, München (1995)
Consensus Statement
Consensus rountable on nutrition support of tube-fed patients with diabetes.
Clinical Nutrition 17, suppl (1998) 63-65
Coulston AM
Clinical experience with modified enteral formulas for patients with
diabetes.
Clinical Nutrition 17, suppl (1998) 46-56
Coulston AM
Enteral nutrition in the patient with diabetes.
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care 3 (2000) 11-15
CraigL, Nicholson S, Silverstone F, Kennedy R
Use of a reduced-carbohydrate, modified-fat enteral formula for improving
metabolic control and clinical outcomes in long-term care residents
with type 2 diabetes: results of a pilot trial.
Nutrition 14 (1998) 529-534
DDG (2000) Deutsche Diabetes-Gesellschaft
Ernährungsempfehlungen für Diabetiker 2000: Stellungnahme der
Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the European Association
for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) und des Ausschusses Ernährung der
Deutschen Diabetes Gesellschaft.
http://www.deutsche-diabetes-gesellschaft.de/statement/empf2000.htm
D.I.E.T.
Ernährungsmedizin und Diätetik aktuell – Im Fokus: Ballaststoffe
in unserer Ernährung – status quo. Deutsches Institut für
Ernährungsmedizin und Diätetik.
Februar (2001) 1-10
Delzenne NM, Kok N
Effects of fructan-type prebiotics on lipid metabolism.
Am J Clin Nutr 73, suppl 2 (2001) 456S-458S
Demetriades H, Botsios D, Kazantzidou D, Sakkas L, Tsalis K, Manos K,
Dadoukis I
Effect of early postoperative enteral feeding on the healing of colocnic
anastromoses in rats. Comparison of three different enteral diets.
Eur Surg Res 31, 1 (1999) 57-63
Ebskov B, Ebsbov L.
Major lower limb amputation in diabetic patients: development during
1982 to 1993.
Diabetologia 39 (1996) 1607-10
Elmadfa I, Leitzmann C
Ernährung des Menschen.
Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart (1998)
Ernährungsbericht
Gesundheitliche Bedeutung sekundärer Pflanzenstoffe.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung (Ed), Frankfurt a. M. (1996)
217-232
Floege J
Diabetische Nephropathie und Hypertonie bei Diabetes mellitus – Prophylaxe
und Therapie.
VitaMinSpur 1 (2001) 35-37
Franzke C
Pflanzenphenole.
In: Franzke C (Ed) Allgemeines Lehrbuch der Lebensmittelchemie.
B. Behrs Verlag, Hamburg (1996) 231-243
Friedmann M, Brandon DL
Nutritional and health benefits of soy proteins.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49,3 (2001) 1069-1086
Gallagher-Allred C, O´Dorisio TM
Quality of life in tube-fed patients with diabetes mellitus.
Clinical Nutrition 17, suppl 2 (1998) 60-62
Gibson GR, Collins MD
Concept of balanced colonic microbiota, prebiotics and synbiotics.
In: Hanson
Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB
Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept
of prebiotics.
American Institute of Nutrition (1995) 1401-1413
Gonzáles-Barranco J
Glucose control guidelines: current concepts.
Clinical Nutrition 17, suppl 2 (1998) 7-17
Haupt E, Standl E, Mehnert H
Behandlung mit insulinotropen oralen Antidiabetika (Sulfonylharstoffen).
In: Mehnert H, Standl E, Usadel K-H (Ed). Diabetologie in Klinik und
Praxis.
4. Auflage, Thieme, Stuttgart (1999)
Hepp K-D, Häring H-U
Einführung in die Biochemie und Pathophysiologie des Stoffwechsels.
In: Mehnert H, Standl E, Usadel K-H (Ed). Diabetologie in Klinik und
Praxis.
4. Auflage, Thieme, Stuttgart (1999)
Hermansen K, Søndergaard M, Høie L, Carstensen M, Brock
B
Beneficial effects of a soy-based dietary supplement on lipid levels
and cardiovascular risk markers in type 2 diabetic subjects.
Diabetes Care 24, 2 (2001) 228-233
Hoffmann L
Neue Empfehlungen bei Diabetes mellitus.
Verbraucherdienst 43,7 (1998) 515-519
Internationale Diabetes Federation
Leitfaden zu Typ-1-Diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes und Stoffwechsel 9, 3 (2000) 173-198
Janka H-U, Standl E, Standl R
Allgemeiner Überblick über die Angiopathien.
In: Mehnert H, Standl E, Usadel K-H (Ed). Diabetologie in Klinik und
Praxis.
4. Auflage, Thieme, Stuttgart (1999)
Jeejeebhoy KN (1999)
The role of chromium in nutrition and therapeutics and as a potential
toxin.
Nutrition Reviews 57, 11 (1999) 329-335
Jenkins DJA, Kendall CWC, Vuksan V
Inulin, oligofructose and intestinal function.
American society for Nutritional Sciences (1999) 1431S-33S
Karsten S
Neue Empfehlungen zur enteralen Ernährung von Diabetikern.
Ernährungs-Umschau 46 (1999) 90-94
Kasper H
Ernährungsmedizin und Diätetik. 9. Auflage
Urban & Fischer, München (2000)
Kerner W
Klassifikation und Diagnose des Diabetes mellitus.
Deutsches Ärzteblatt 95, 49 (1998) A3144-A3148
Khalil L, Ho KH, Png D, Ong CL
The effect of enteral fibre-containing feeds on stool parameters in the
post-surgical period.
Singapore Med J 39, 4 (1998) 156-159
Klinikarzt
Insulinsesitizer: Wende in der Therapie des Typ-2-Diabetes.
Klinikarzt 29, 2 (2000) VII
Koivisto VA, Yki-Jarvinen H
Fructose and insulinsensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes.
J Intern Med 233, 2 (1993) 145-153
Landgraf R, Halsbeck M
Diagnose und Differentialdiagnose.
In: Mehnert H, Standl E, Usadel K-H (Ed).
Diabetologie in Klinik und Praxis. 4. Auflage
Thieme, Stuttgart (1999)
Laube H, Mehnert H
Ernährungstherapie
In: Mehnert H, Standl E, Usadel K-H (Ed)
Diabetologie in Klinik und Praxis. 4. Auflage
Thieme, Stuttgart (1999)
Lean ME, Noroozi M, Kelly I, Burns J, Talwar D, Sattar N, Crozier A
Dietary flavonols protect diabetic human lymphocytes against oxidative
damage to DNA.
Diabetes 48, 1 (1999) 176-181
Lohmann D
Diabetes mellitus Typ II.
Klinik der Gegenwart XV, 2 (1993) 1-27
Manuel y Keenoy B, Vertomemen J, De Leeuw I
The effect of flavonoid treatment on the glycation and antioxant status
in Type 1 diabetic patients.
Diabetes Nutr Metab 12, 4 (1999) 256-263
McCargar LJ, Innis SM, Bowron E, Leichter J, Dawson K, Toth E, Wall
K
Effect of enteral nutritional products differing in carbohydrate and
fat on indices of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in patients with
NIDDM.
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 188 (1998) 81-89
McMahon MM, Rizza RA
Nutrition support in hospitalized patients with diabetes mellitus.
Mayo Clin Proc 71 (1996) 587-594
Miyake Y, Yamamoto K, Tsujihara N, Osawa T
Protective effects of lemon flavonoids on oxidative stress in diabetic
rats.
Lipids 33, 7 (1998) 689-695
Monitori VM, Farmer A, Wollan PC, Dinneen SF
Fish oil supplementation in type 2 diabetes: a quantitative systematic
review.
Diabetes Care 23 (2000) 1407-1415
Morris BW, Mac Neil S, Hardisty CA, Heller S, Burgin C, Gray TA
Chromium homeostasis in patients with type II (NIDDM) diabetes.
J Trace Elem Med Biol 13, 1-2 (1999) 57-61
Müller SD
Chrom und Zink in der Diabetestherapie.
VitaMinSpur 16, S1 (2001) 79-81
Mutanen M, Freesse R
Polyunsaturated fatty acids and peatelet aggregation.
Current Opinion in Lipidology 7 (1996) 14-19
Over M
Krankheitsbild des Diabetes mellitus (1. Folge).
Pflegen Ambulant 3 (1992) 19-22
Potter SM, Baum JA, Stillman RJ, Shay NF, Erdman JW
Soy protein Isoflavones: their effects on blood lipids and bone density
in postmenopausal women.
Am J Clin Nutr 68 (1998) 137S-1379S
Preiser JC, Van Gonsum A, Berre J, Vincent JL, Carpentier Y
Enteral feeding with a solution enriched with antioxidant vitamins A,
C and E enhances the resistance to oxidative stress.
Crit Care Med 28, 12 (2000) 3828-32
Prince MJ, Deeg MA
Do n-3 fatty acids improve glucose tolerance and oliemia in diabetics?
Current Opinion in Lipidology 8 (1997) 7-11
Rehner G, Daniel H
Biochemie der Ernährung.
Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg-Berlin (1999)
Risse A
Typ-II-Diabetiker in Deutschland: Zu viele Amputationen – jede
zweite vermeidbar.
Ärztliche Praxis – Jubiläumsausgabe 1 (1999)
Rosak C, Böhm BO
Behandlung mit Insulin.
In: Mehnert H, Standl E, Usadel K-H (Ed). Diabetologie in Klinik und
Praxis. 4. Auflage
Thieme, Stuttgart (1999)
Rösen P, Nawroth PP, King G, Möller W, Tritschler H-J, Packer
L
The role of oxidative stress in the onset and progression of diabetes
and its complications: a summery of a congress series sponsored byUNESCO-MCBN,
the American Diabetes Association and the German Diabetes Society.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev 17 (2001) 15-24
Saito M
Dietary docosahexaenoic acid does not promote tissue lipid peroxide formation
to the extent expected from the peroxidizability index of the lipids.
Biofactors 13, 1-4 (2000) 15-24
Sanz-Paris A, Cavo L, Guallard A, Salazar I, Albero R
High-fat versus high-carbohydrate enteral formulae: effect on blood glucose,
c-peptide, and ketones in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with
insulin or sulfonylurea.
Nutrition 14 (1998) 840-845
Sauer I, Rath W
Gestationsdiabetes-
VitaMinSpur S1 (2001) 114-117
Schrezenmeir J
Rationale for specialized nutrition support for Hyperglycemic patients.
Clinical Nutrition 17, suppl 2 (199() 26-34
Schumacher B
Neue europäische Ernährungsempfehlungen für Diabetiker.
VitaMinSpur 14 (1999) 86
Schumacher B
Diabetische Polyneuropathie II.
VitaMinSpur 15 (2000) 36-37
Shah M, Garg A
High-fat and high-carbohydrate diets and energy balance.
Diabetes Care 19 (1996) 1142-1152
Shankardass K, Chuchmach S, Chelswick K, Stefanovich C, Spurr S, Brooks
J, Tsai M, Saibil FG, Cohes LB, Edington JD
Bowel function of long-term tube-fed patients consuming formulae with
and without dietary fiber.
J Parenter Enter Nutr 14,5 (1990) 508-512
Standl E, Janka HU, Mehnert H
Behandlung mit nichtinsulinotopen oralen Antidiabetika.
In: Mehnert H, Standl E, Usadel K-H (Ed). Diabetologie in Klinik und
Praxis. 4. Auflage
Thieme, Stuttgart (1999)
Stiller P, Huber H, Bögl M, Friedrich M, Haslbeck M
Metabolische Wirkungen einer kohlenhydratmodifizierten bilanzierten Diät
bei Typ-II-Diabetes.
Akt Ernähr-Med 18 (1993) 70
Stürmer W, Kramer E, Kaper H, Schrezenmeir J
Favourable glycaemic effects of a new balanced liquid diet for enteral
nutrition – Results of a short-term study in 30 Type II diabetic
patients.
Clinical Nutrition 13 (1994) 221-227
Van Gaal LF, Van Acker KL, DeLeeuw IH
Repaglanide improves blood glucose control in sulphonylurea-naive type
2 diabetes.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract 53 ,3 (2001) 141-148
Vincent JB
Quest for the molecur mechanism of chromium action and its relationship
to diabetes.
Nutrition Reviews 58,3 (2000) 67-72
Vogt M, Adamek H-E, Arnold J-C, Schilling D, Schleiffer T, Riemann J-F
Gastrointestinale Komplikationen des Diabetes mellitus.
Med Klin 94 (1999) 329-337
Washburn S, Burke GL, Morgan T, Anthony M
Effect of soy protein supplementation on serum lipoproteins, blood pressure,
and menopausal symptoms in perimenopausal women.
Menopause 6 (1999) 7-13
Wright J
Total parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition in diabetes.
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care 3 (2000) 5-10
Yokozawa T, Dong E
Influence of green tea and its three major components upon low-density
lipoprotein oxidation.
Exp Toxicol Pathol 49, 5 (1997) 329-335